Welcome Guest!

Quick Find:  

Advanced Search

Languages: English Español

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional ¡CSS Válido! Icono de conformidad con el Nivel Doble-A, 
	de las Directrices de Accesibilidad para el 
	Contenido Web 1.0 del W3C-WAI

Milking the Reputation Cow: Argumentation, Reasoning and Cognitive Agents

Milking the Reputation Cow: Argumentation, Reasoning and Cognitive Agents
Milking the Reputation Cow: Argumentation, Reasoning and Cognitive Agents

Isaac Pinyol Catadau

Affiliation: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Institut d’Investigació en Intel·ligèncía Artificial (Bellaterra, España)

Biography: Not available

Close window

Isaac Pinyol Catadau

About the authors 

Publication year: 2011

Language: English

Subjects: Science and Technology

Collection: Monografies de l'Institut d'Investigació en Intel-ligencia Artificial

Free eBook


Computational trust and reputation models have been recognized as one of the key technologies required to design and implement agent systems. These models manage and aggregate the information needed by agents to efficiently perform partner selection in uncertain situations. For simple applications, a game theoretical approach similar to that used in most models can suffice. However, if we want to undertake problems found in socially complex virtual societies, we need more sophisticated trust and reputation systems, that not only focus on the construction and inference of social evaluations (epistemic decisions), but on their role in the practical reasoning performed by the agents (pragmaticstrategic decisions) and on communications and dialectical processes (memetic decisions). Most of the current state-of-the-art models struggle with epistemic decisions, on how agents evaluate other agents according to certain criteria. Curiously, pragmatic-strategic and memetic decisions are traditionally left apart, either because they are implicit in the model or because it is too dependent on the domain. This work explores this gap, arguing that in complex scenarios where more cognitive approaches are needed, both pragmatic-strategic and memetic decisions are as important as epistemic ones. Firstly, we construct an ontology of reputation and a reputation language that captures the information that most of the current state-of-the-art computational trust and reputation models manage. This starting point serves, by the one hand, to define a belief-desire-intention (BDI) agent architecture that integrates reputation information. Then, desires and intentions interact with beliefs that contain information coming from reputation models. The architecture is flexible enough to model a wide number of agents’ families and precisely determines the practical reasoning process that leads to the best reasonable action. On the other hand, we exploit the reputation language and use it to define an argumentation-based protocol that allows two parties to engage in dialog processes and exchange reputation-related information. The protocol permits agents justify their social evaluations, endowing them with the capability to intendedly decide whether communicated social evaluations are reliable according to their own knowledge.

Table of Contents Table of Contents (0.08 Mb)

Preview Preview (0.12 Mb)

Bibliographic information

Physical Description : XVII, 180 p. : gráf. ; 24 cm

ISBN: 978-84-00-09352-5

eISBN: 978-84-00-09353-2

Publication: Bellaterra (España) : Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 2011

Reference CSIC: 12025

Other data: Thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Barcelona (Spain), 2010

Buy the digital edition at

This eBook is available for free download

Free Downloads

Download eBook Download eBook (3.87 Mb)

This book was added to our online catalog on Monday 21 October, 2013.